
Diplomacy
has never been my strong suit.
I mean, if the “Hey, Stupid People” comic wasn’t proof of that, I
don’t know what is.
I guess the whole thing goes back to the fact that I have always had a
rather short temper.
As I’ve gotten older, I’ve managed to control it enough to remain
within acceptable limits for general society, but I still heat up pretty
quickly. I
just really wish it weren't true.
It
just seems to me that there is a certain line that must not, under any
circumstances be crossed. I don't think that this means that crossing the
line is a capital offense, I just don't think that it should be without
consequences. ...But maybe there are extenuating circumstances.
Right? And if there are, then doesn't that mean that getting mad at
someone for crossing the line is inappropriate? Then the question becomes,
how far does the line get moved? And then later, if they push past the old
line, are we being inconsistent by not giving them the latitude we did when
things were different?
Sometimes
people get hurt. I understand this. I also understand that
sometimes, regardless of what we want, we end up hurting other people. I
can even see that, by extension, the people we hurt unintentionally (no...that's
the wrong word...perhaps "without malice" is better) should be given
the room to blow up and say things that would otherwise be reason enough to
allow yourself to lose your temper. I'm just saying that I'm having a
really hard time seeing where the allowances should end and where it becomes a
matter of them taking advantage of the fact that I'm giving them more ground for
something that I'm somewhat responsible for.
Sometimes
I wonder why I bother getting up in the morning.